On 03/14/2012 03:06 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Heh, not to say that rth's implementation isn't a good one :-)... I just meant to say if it doesn't meet someone else's requirements for whatever reason, they are welcome to enhance it :-)No comment on whether its better or worse than any other library, but once we have one in place in the toolchain, everyone is welcome to enhance it with a better implementation.
Andrew
