On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, paul.chav...@fnac.net wrote: > It seems that gcc/libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4 doesn't check for bugs in > early glibc-2.2.x series anymore. So, it doesn't detect the lack of > newlocale, duplocale, freelocale, nl_langinfo_l and uselocale. On the > other hand, there is a new test for the presence of uclibc > (!defined(__UCLIBC__)).
The point of that change of mine <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01381.html> was to eliminate an AC_TRY_RUN test that was bad for cross compiling. I guess this issue indicates that we do still need a compile or link test to make sure the functions are present - although not testing for any particular bugs in them. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
