Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > This is about sh and sh64 GDB sim testing for the whole toolchain. (I > also do have sh4a hardware available, where testing is working fine.) > Kaz, could you please have a look whether this looks basically sane, that > my assumptions and the results I'm getting are about right, etc.?
You are right, I think. > Kaz, is my understanding correct, that I simply use sh64-elf as target, > and again the sh-sim board? Should I be setting a specific CPU when > configuring GCC, or any other customization? I used sh64-sim board for sh64-elf. sh64-sim.exp baseboard can be seen in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2008-02/msg00056.html > This means, for sh-elf sim testing, we have a bit too many failures in > GCC and GDB, and some ld test harness issue. For sh64-elf we have a GCC > trunk ICE, some section overlap issue, and even more GDB issues. Yep. About sh64, I had used sh64-linux as my testing target, but unfortunately that real sh64 system stopped working after the earthquake. Regards, kaz
