-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/11 03:49, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Given that you only recently merged with trunk again are you > really sure this is a great idea at this point in time? Does the > GCC 4.7 user community benefit from this in any way (or rather how > much percentage of it)? > > Thus, please consider merging early during GCC 4.8 stage1 instead. This stuff is fairly isolated in terms of what it touches and I'm sure if anything goes wrong, Aldy, Richard & Torvald will be available to fix it. The request to merge came in before the end of stage1, I don't see a reason to delay things another 6-9 months. This isn't like asking to pull in a whole new register allocator at the end of stage1 :-) Additionally, I believe we have a small window where we can position GCC to be the compiler of choice for those working with TM; waiting 6-9 months for GCC 4.8 will miss that window. Jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOsA7jAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7S7AH/27+psLfl2BMUnxK6aJkbH7i UVto6b56d/mBKxNRAWr1CtwM2EQ312ZdR6Q5kWbXTfEOj/HaWHzg/0EROKT28HDn 3HQausblOz677J0Xx8iiAeuG7FY9pcsFKIs89KIDWqouuPkP1iea6ZxiMyF2YhDO bOdXUscyD5upYU8t8Xk9PUB/LoRpby7wPRpmVuK6sd+SAyNYOZRRzQ6Rfu6eHdGB R6jWktJmuNbKacFTYAFL7bwVRtFayb3VvrOwO+tIFcsUPRmHloz31HtCLjt0G6Vo q+cwRM345Ku3IT2+8o/GHORKg3rD0wXdA9dUj/hMLcW321s5pMHnADcF14zzha0= =CEcq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
