On 21 September 2011 18:51, Nathan Ridge wrote: > > Now that the C++11 standard has been officially voted in, there is nothing > "experimental" about it any more.
I thought the "experimental" refers to GCC's support, not the standard's status. GCC's support didn't magically change when the standard was made official. (Arguably the support *is* good enough to not be labelled experimental, but that change should be made because GCC's support is good enough, not because C++11 is official.)
