Hi,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Miles Bader <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> writes:
>>> "g++ -Wall -Wextra ..." should flag a warning on the following code
>>> but does not.
>>
>> Thanks for the apology, but it should still be reported to bugzilla
>> not to this list.
I was hoping someone could submit a bugzilla report. I don't want to
create an account which I may never use again.
>
> BTW, it should only warn if given -Weffc++, right?
-Weffc++ does not catch the dangerous error in my code. -Wall caught
another Item21 error somewhere else in my code:
std::vector<XYZ*>&
get_XYYs()
{
std::vector<XYZ*> result;
return result;
}
I notice -Weffc++ produces more warnings on my code, but -Wall knows
about Item21. Both -Weffc++ and -Wall only see get_XYZs() as an
Item21 violation but not get_XYZ_data() which returns the local
variable as a reference in an std::pair.
>
> -Miles
>
> --
> People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at
> least some idea of what the underlying hardware is like. Otherwise the
> programs they write will be pretty weird. -- Donald Knuth
>
Thanks.
Regards,
Fung Chai.
--
FWIW: $\lnot \exists x \, {\rm Right} (x) \leftarrow \forall x \, {\rm
Wrong} (x)$ \hfill -- Stephen Stills
Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose -- Kris Kristofferson
