>> I think one should handle member functions (cf. example below). I am not >> sure whether other things >> like type extension or accessibility should be handled. > > DWARF has attributes for accessibility (e.g., public, private). If the > attributes are similar to those for C++, you should generate them in a > similar fashion.
I would say they are sufficiently similar in order to also use them for Fortran. > I'm not sure what "type extension" means. Well, this is just the Fortran terminology for what would be called 'inheritance' in C++. > You might translate the Fortran program into comparable C++ and > see what g++ generates, then try to match it with gfortran. That might be a good starting point. Thanks for your comments. Cheers, Janus
