Ian Lance Taylor schrieb: > Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de> writes: > >> Ian Lance Taylor schrieb: >>> Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de> writes: >>> >> Wondering why there is now just another t-target, both t-targets >> containing snips of libgcc. > > There is a very slowly moving incomplete transition to move all the > libgcc configury support and sources from gcc/config/* to > libgcc/config/*. > > If you are creating new files you can help that transition by creating > them in libgcc rather than gcc.
May I say that I like the "classical" setup more because all target dependent code resides in ./gcc/config/$target (besides some lines for adding a target and some hacks in ./gcc/longlong.h that could easily be moved into target directory) I don't like that scattering of target dependent parts. Target dependent libgcc parts could just the same way reside in ./gcc/config/$target/libgcc/ instead of ./libgcc/config/$target/ and maybe many other places. Johann
