On 08/02/2011 11:07, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:27 PM, FX <fxcoud...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> GCC maintainers is this OK for your policy? >> Personally, I don't think it's a good thing to do: a secondary platform >> that only supports the latest released version of said platform does not >> indicate high stability. But it's up to the cygwin maintainers to decide, >> of course. >> >> However, the fact should be documented on the installation notes >> (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#x-x-cygwin) and probably on the >> release notes as well, with something like "The GCC 4.6 series requires >> Cygwin x.y.z or later". > > Indeed. Maybe also document a workaround (if possible), like "download > fenv.h from this link and put it there".
It needs the actual support routines from the Cygwin DLL as well as the header file. But yes, I will write a patch for the requirements page. Shouldn't libquadmath have an autoconf test for fenv.h? Or otherwise not be unconditionally enabled by default? cheers, DaveK