On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Dongsheng Song > <dongsheng.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:44, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> It would be nice if the scripts could check whether only DATESTAMP >>> changes were done since the last snapshot ... >> >> Just for curiousness, why we bump the DATESTAMP when the last commit is >> DATESTAMP changes on the branch ? > > I wonder why we keep DATESTAMP at all now that we have a global > source revision number (remember, CVS did not have that). >
You get revision number only with contrib/gcc_update and not everyone uses it. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/ I primarily use GIT mirror which doesn't use subversion number. -- H.J.
