On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:22, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ugh. Sebastian - can we nuke tree-loop-linear compeltely and > make -ftree-loop-linear an alias for -floop-interchange without > regressions? I'd like to reduce the number of broken passes from > 2 to 1 this way ...
I wouldn't mind removing tree-loop-linear, although other people should also give their opinion on this matter: tree-loop-linear has no external dependences whereas -floop-interchange depends on cloog and ppl. Also we should get all the testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ltrans-*.c passing with -floop-interchange. I will add all these testcases to the graphite testsuite and see where we stand. Sebastian
