On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > The gcc maintainers unfortunately didn't want to integrate the > > wrapper scripts to make it easy, but they can be always downloaded > > separately and I assume distributions will eventually ship > > them anyways. > > No we do just not as scripts. We want real programs rather shell > based scripts so it is more portable.
And programs that take proper account of the transformed name under which the compiler driver they are running will be installed, rather than hardcoding "gcc" (and bad assumptions that the presence of "xgcc" means a GCC build directory), to mention another piece of my feedback that was ignored in the resubmission. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
