On 12/07/2010 04:20 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> The only problem left is mixing of lto and non lto objects. this right
> now is not handled. IMHO still the best way to handle it is to use
> slim lto and then simply separate link the "left overs" after deleting
> the LTO objects. This can be actually done with objcopy (with some
> limitations), doesn't even need linker support.
>
Quite possibly a better way to deal with that is to provide a mechanism
for encapsulating arbitrary binary code objects inside the LTO IR.
-hpa
