> Ahh, you mean something like this? (Fixes the testcase, but not
> properly tested yet.)
Yes, but I think you still need the regular treatment for these CALL_INSNs:
Index: postreload.c
===================================================================
--- postreload.c (revision 166701)
+++ postreload.c (working copy)
@@ -1354,8 +1354,8 @@ reload_combine (void)
}
}
- else if (JUMP_P (insn)
- && GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) != RETURN)
+
+ if (control_flow_insn_p (insn) && GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) != RETURN)
{
/* Non-spill registers might be used at the call destination in
some unknown fashion, so we have to mark the unknown use. */
--
Eric Botcazou
