Hello, * FX wrote on Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 11:22:50AM CEST: > > This is a known issue and related to timestamps of those generated > > .texi files. By touching generated .texi it can be solved.
Hacked around, I would say, not solved. I guess to solve it, genhooks should produce output in binary mode, so the content really is identical, or diff should be used to compare output > > This test > > in make is here a bit broken IMHO, as a content check would satisfy > > needs for validity-check alone. I'm not sure I understand. There are three possibilities: tm.texi is out of date wrt. tm.texi.in, or the user edited the wrong file inadvertently, or things are in sync. > I'm wondering about this part of the Makefile: > > elif test $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi -nt $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi.in \ > && test $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi -nt $(srcdir)/doc/target.def; then \ > > because I don't think I have a $(srcdir)/doc/target.def, but > $(srcdir)/target.def That looks like another bug to me. I opened <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888>. Might look into it, but not right now. Cheers, Ralf
