Thanks for the reply.
I made the changes that you described, but I'm still experiencing the
same behavior--namely that I think that I should see two unexpected
errors since 1) the test case will not compile and 2) the expected
error message is not printed.
Here are the steps to reproduce (assuming that a stage1 compiler has
already been built and that version 4.6.0 20100831 (experimental) of
the GCC is being used):
1) create the file pr99.C at <GCCSRC>/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template.
2) paste the following code in pr99.C:
/*{dg-do compile}*/
template<typename S> class X {};
template<typename Q> int f(X<int>, X<Q>);
template<typename B> int f(X<B>, X<int>);
int main(void) {
return f(X<int>(), X<int>());/*{ dg-error "int f(X<B>, X<int>)"} */
}
3) from the <GCC_BUILD> directory, run the following command:
make -C gcc check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=pr99.C
_____
What I actually see in the results is:
Running /home/david/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: g++.dg/template/pr99.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of unexpected failures 1 //<--SHOULDN'T THIS BE 2 INSTEAD OF 1?
/home/david/gccbuild/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ version 4.6.0
20100831 (experimental) (GCC)
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote:
> David Weiser <david...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I am looking at bug number 99 on
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99 and I am adding a test
>> case for it.
>> The testcase looks like this:
>> //-----------start test case
>> /*
>> {do-run compile}
>> */
>
> This should be
>
> /* { dg-do compile } */
>
> or, equivalently for C++,
>
> // { dg-do compile }
>
> Ian
>
--
Thanks,
dw
