On 09/06/2010 06:18 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote: >>>> >>>>> Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>>>>> Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference? >>>>>> >>>>>> From our release criteria, for secondary platforms we have: >>>>>> >>>>>> • The compiler bootstraps successfully, and the C++ runtime library >>>>>> builds. >>>>>> • The DejaGNU testsuite has been run, and a substantial majority of >>>>>> the >>>>>> tests pass. >>>>> >>>>> See for instance: >>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00295.html >>>> >>>> There are no libstdc++ results in that. >>>> >>>> Richard. >>> >>> This is true. I always run make check-gcc. What should I be doing instead? >> >> make -k check >> > > Ugh. And I thought I was golden :) > > This apparently requires autogen to do something about > fixincludes/check.tpl. I have no idea what that is or what that > means....
Just ignore the fixincludes test results. Andrew.
