On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 15:19 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> 
> > However, our patch also added some improvements to gengtype itself
> 
> Improvements are desirable, but if it is all possible you should
> separate these improvements from your other work.  It is very hard to
> review patches which combine different unrelated ideas in a single diff.


We only improved some minor points of gengtype when we had bugs related
to code that we found difficult to understand or to read. In particular

* replacement of the kludge of putting a language bitmask four bytes
before the path name of input files with a real structure for input
files.

* replacement of the get_output_file_with_visibility code with a
sequence of regular-expression rules.

None of these patch is unrelated to our main work of adding persistency
to gengtype. We had to make these improvements to make the whole thing
work.

A big thanks for your comments.

Cheers
-- 
Basile STARYNKEVITCH         http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mine, sont seulement les miennes} ***

Reply via email to