On Sat, 10 Jul 2010, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Well, let me add one short comment then. I'd say hppa2-hpux is still > much more relevant than ia64-hpux -- at least, everywhere I'm looking > i.e. workstations. It may be different in the server market. > > Anyway, when I look at posted gcc-testresults of this month, there are > *zero* postings of testresults for ia64-hpux, and daily results (more, > in fact) for hppa2-hpux. > > can we keep hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 as a secondary target for at least > one more release, and not add ia64-hpux?
I find your line of reasoning very convincing. :-) Gerald
