On Mon, 24 May 2010, Mark Mitchell wrote: > As to whether this is a better choice than working on GIMPLE back-ends, > I think that's unclear. There's no question that a GIMPLE back-end > would be prettier. I think it's a question of what your goals are. If
I don't think of the two as being mutually exclusive; the end point of a series of improvements to RTL types and datastructures could be that RTL ends up as a form of GIMPLE, if the changes are planned that way (and if you are making such changes to RTL, the advantages of moving towards low-GIMPLE are clear). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
