On Sun, 2 May 2010, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > >> It is according to http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cpplib.html that such > >> support is planned. > > That page generally appears very out of date; it's not been updated since > > 2002. > > > > I have a 15-point todo list for extended identifiers, the very last point > > of which is enabling -fextended-identifiers by default for C99, C1X and > > C++. This represents the results of analysis of the current state of GCC > > against the requirements for extended identifiers I agreed with Zack (PR > > 9449 comment 21). Fixing all the various cases required is however low > > priority. > > Should we remove the patch, then, or add a note?
The obvious thing to do is to add a note that it represents state as of 2002. Some bits are probably still relevant, but I don't know which. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
