On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Richard Earnshaw <rearn...@arm.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:24 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Dave Korn >> <dave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > On 29/01/2010 11:03, Richard Guenther wrote: >> > >> >> This should ideally be documented in >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html >> > >> > Both the way that page is named, and the way the link to it is indented >> > under the link to the BZ frontpage in the side navbar on the gcc.gnu.org >> > front >> > page, make it look very much like it's intended for BZ admins, rather than >> > ordinary bug-reporting users. Maybe that needs a bit of tweaking too? Or >> > perhaps a prominent link from the "How to report" page? >> >> Sure - patches welcome ;) >> >> Attached is what I will install barring any negative comments. >> >> Richard. > >> + A P1 bug blocks the release. > > Do you really mean that, or do you mean a P1 regression? Maybe it > should read: > > A P1 regression blocks the release; any other P1 bug will hold > up the release until this issue has been fully reviewd.
Priorities do not mean anything for a release if they are not regressions. Note how everything in the priority section talks about regressions only. I'll adjust the wording to "A P1 regression blocks the release.". Thanks, Richard.
