On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Dave Korn wrote: > But does it, though? From http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html: >[...] > So, where are whitespace changes to non-comment parts of .c and .h > source files covered? I think that there may be a bit of a common > assumption that "obvious" extends somewhat further than the wording of > the documentation actually implies - not just in the context of this > incident, but the question has occurred to me in other cases too, and > maybe now would be a good time to clear it up.
So... On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote: > I agree the wording could be better. ...does one of you have a suggestion on how to improve the wording? The svnwrite.html page never was ment to be "the law", more like documenting best practises and some rules of thumb, but of course improvements will be welcome. Gerald
