On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Mark Mitchell <m...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> This still has exactly two initialisers for exactly two objects, so I >> think it's OK. I'm concerned about missing braces when the meaning of >> the code may not be what you expect. > > I think you're right -- you want -Wmissing-field-initializers, not > -Wmissing-braces. -Wmissing-braces is explicitly about not having all > the brace groups fully specified. >
ok. -- Gaby
