Axel Freyn wrote:
> Hi Ansis,
>
> first: you should use gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org for questions like this...
Indeed. However, from the gcc@ point of view:
> Yes, this approach is save.
No, not remotely, and everyone on this list already knows why (or ought to
after a few moments thought, or else they're probably on the wrong list), so
I'll just point it out here for the record. Anyone stumbling across this in
the archives can go check the reply on gcc-help(*) if they want a detailed
explanation.
cheers,
DaveK
--
(*) - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2009-11/msg00144.html
