> extensibility, this isn't a problem for these extensions, as older > DWARF readers will simply ignore the location expressions that use the > extensions -- which produces the same behavior as DWARF-2 without > those extensions.
I said "will simply ignore" when I guess I should have said "should simply ignore". Obviously, the whole point of the -gstrict-dwarf option is to deal with certain tools that don't simply ignore the extensions. -cary
