On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Zolt??n K??csi wrote: > I wonder if there would be at least a theoretical support by the > developers to a proposal for volatile bitfields:
It has been proposed (and not rejected, but not yet implemented) that volatile bit-fields should follow the ARM EABI specification (on all targets); that certainly seems better than inventing something new unless you have a very good reason to prefer the something new on some targets. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
