On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Jack Howarth wrote:
> I can confirm that the second proposed solution of passing
> -Wl,-no_compact_unwind
> to the linkage of the g++.dg/torture/stackalign/eh-vararg-2.C test cases
> eliminates
> the execution error on x86_64-apple-darwin10 so that option works. This leads
> to a
> dejagnu question. I want to do a quick and dirty test to see that
> -Wl,-no_compact_unwind
> suppresses all of the regressions that appeared at r147995, however I can't
> puzzle out
> how to formulate...
>
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-Wl,-no_compact_unwind}'"
>
> such that -Wl,-no_compact_unwind is interpreted as a single run with
> one flag being passed (ie not one run with -Wl and one run with
> -no_compact_unwind). Any ideas?
The -Xlinker spelling may be useful - try
"--target_board=unix/-Xlinker/-no_compact_unwind".
--
Joseph S. Myers
[email protected]
