>>>>> "Erwin" == Unruh, Erwin <erwin.un...@ts.fujitsu.com> writes:
Erwin> In current gcc the order of options -D and -U is significant. The Erwin> Single Unix(r) Specification explicitly specifies that the order Erwin> should not matter for the c89 command. It reads (cited from Erwin> version 2, which is ten years old): Erwin> I did not find a justification for the current gcc Erwin> behavior. GCC's behavior is more useful. And, given its age, I think it would be a mistake to change it. I think if you want the c89 behavior, a wrapper program of some kind would be the way to go. Tom
