Laurent GUERBY wrote: > Isn't it the same as > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40578 > > Were I suggested GNAT_FOPEN (and you commented too)?
Oh, thanks for the reminder. Yes, it is, so I marked the new one as a dup
and took the assignment of the first one. I'll respin the patch as requested
and post to -patches in a little while. Thanks all for advice.
cheers,
DaveK
