On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 14:50, Olatunji Ruwase<tjruw...@google.com> wrote: > Sorry that I wasn't very specific with my question. I m currently > wrapping up the conversion of > mudflap into a plugin. Most of the required patches have being > approved and committed, so I was > thinking ahead as to where the the plugin code will reside.
Ah, this is a different issue. What you are proposing is to take mudflap out of GCC and convert it into a separate plugin. I don't really have a strong opinion on mudflap in particular. I wouldn't mind making it a plugin, though. What do other folks think? In general I think spinning off modules/passes that are not used very frequently (e.g. the tree browser) is a good idea since it reduces the size of our code base. Diego.
