Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 2, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote:

On 07/02/2009 12:06 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Andrew Haley wrote
Is this really a good idea?  Surely the solution is to fix the
failures on Darwin.

I don't this is a good idea. As noted by Andrew Pinski, one failure
was Darwin specific and is now fixed, two others are powerpc ones.
When they will be fixed on trunk the annoying mails will automatically
disappear.

However, this does not mean that tuning the regression tester to not sending more than 6 emails a day (one every 4 hours) would be a bad idea.

It is once every commit until it is fixed which seems like the correct way of doing it really. We really should be frozen during the period it is broken. Otherwise more things break like what happened here.

--Pinski


Paolo

Reply via email to