Jeff Law wrote:
> (*) Imagine something like this (and related variants)
>
> EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (bitmap, 0, i, bi)
> {
> blah blah blah
>
> if (bitmap_empty_p (bitmap))
> {
> modify bitmap
> break;
> }
> more blah blah
> }
>
> We exit without iterating BI and thus miss your check.
That's OK; there's no problem if you don't use the iterator again after you
modify the bitmap.
cheers,
DaveK
