On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:15, Basile STARYNKEVITCH<bas...@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
>> All this makes me think that >> >> A. we should generate appropriately a $gccplugins/gtyp-input-plugins.list >> B. we should install gengtype as gcc-gengtype at some appropriate place >> C. we should document that, and update the documentation on how to build >> plugins. > > I don't know what mailing list is the better place to discuss that. This is the right forum. For the time being, I would just document that plugins wanting to use GGC should keep a gcc build tree around. If there is significant demand for GGC in the future, we could rethink this. I am hoping that not very many plugins will want/need GGC, but I'm frequently wrong. Diego.
