Andrew Haley wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> So, this is a real bug then - but it's a missed optimisation in the first
>> case, not a bogus one in the second case?
>
> Probably, but it's not a very interesting one. For what it's worth, the
> tree dumps are identical right up to the very last tree optimization pass.
Did you accidentally send an old draft? This sounds a lot like what you
said yesterday, or did you just mean to de-emphasise it a bit? I guess I
agree that it's not a very important missed optimisation, you have to expect a
few when volatile is in play.
cheers,
DaveK
