Sorry if I'm slow in understanding: Are you saying that introducing an extra field would cause problems (memory or other) ? Do you think it would be okay to use the Str3 field, then?
Thanks. Robert Dewar wrote: > Oliver Kellogg wrote: > > On 2009-04-19, at 23:19 +0200, Oliver Kellogg wrote: > >> [...] > >> > >> How about not doing the name expansion in-place but rather > >> storing the expanded name in an extra node field? > > > > I haven't received any reaction on this question yet. > > Perhaps I could reuse the Str3 field instead? (I haven't looked > > into the depths of its usage yet.) > > I don't see any room in the node for this extra field ... >
