Paolo, > sed does not have +.
Thanks for the hint. Apparently GNU sed version 4.1.5 has it, provided you use -r, but I was wondering what to do since I did not see it in fixincl.x. So I will use [ \t][ \t]*. Dominique
Paolo, > sed does not have +.
Thanks for the hint. Apparently GNU sed version 4.1.5 has it, provided you use -r, but I was wondering what to do since I did not see it in fixincl.x. So I will use [ \t][ \t]*. Dominique