On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > Note that I do not propose to add this sort of substantial target-specific > code change to my patch to remove deprecated targets/features > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00527.html> (currently > pending review for 4.5); I'll leave such removals to target maintainers > (just as I did not remove all the Unicos/Mk code that's still present in > the Alpha back end when removing deprecated target/features for 4.4, > leaving that to the Alpha maintainers).
Right. Should it be agreed that deprecating Itanium1 is a good idea, then of course I'll take care of removing the code for it, but I would do it at the end of the GCC 4.5 development cycle. Does that make sense? Ciao! Steven
