Yes, if i change the structure to bring the 3 1-bit members forward, to
avoid padding, the testcase does pass.
Thanks to both of you for your help.
Cheers
Hari
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:44:11PM +0000, Hariharan Sandanagobalane wrote:
Since r144598, pr39339.c has been failing on picochip. On investigation,
it looks to me that the testcase is illegal.
Relevant source code:
struct C
{
unsigned int c;
struct D
{
unsigned int columns : 4;
unsigned int fore : 9;
unsigned int back : 9;
As the testcase fails with buggy (pre r144598) gcc and succeeds after even
with:
unsigned int fore : 12;
unsigned int back : 6;
instead of :9, :9, I think we could change it (does it succeed on picochip
then)? Or move to gcc.dg/torture/ and run only on int32plus targets.
Or add if (sizeof (int) != 4 || sizeof (struct D) != 4) return 0
to the beginning of main.
Jakub
