Mark Mitchell wrote: > Joseph S. Myers wrote: > >> As code shared by GCC and glibc I would suggest the same license notice as >> soft-fp (LGPL >= 2.1 + exception) to allow an identical file to be shared. >> (Indeed, soft-fp uses this header.) The version in GMP diverged long ago >> so sharing the file with that may not be feasible. > > I have suggested this change to the SC.
The FSF has approved the change. Joseph, would you please update the license notice on the file to match soft-fp? Please update any active branches with the problem as well to avoid confusion for anyone working from those branches. Thank you, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
