"H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com> writes: > We can solve it with > > 1. A target should define MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT properly. > 2. g++ should issue an error when the default new operator > is used on a type whose alignment is greater than > MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT. > 3. It is user's responsibility to provide a new operator to return > a properly aligned memory. > 4. g++ can assume memory return by the user-provided new > operator is properly aligned.
Sounds good as far as it goes. How do we get there from here? What should the behaviour of __attribute__ ((aligned)) be? Should we add any new __attribute ((aligned (XXX))) options? Ian
