On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:12:08AM +0800, Jie Zhang wrote: > >[...] Other alternatives would include having > >emutls define something in addition to HAVE_TLS that activates the > >!HAVE_TLS implementation in libmudflap/mf-hooks3.c. > > Thanks for your help! How about the attached patch, which follows your > advice?
That makes sense to me, but I'd appreciate others' advice too (rth?). - FChE
