On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:01:07PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2008, at 3:24 PM, IainS wrote:
>> if one did -lgcc_s.10.x -lgcc_s.1 would that break it?
>> ... should it not pick up only the unresolved symbols from s.1
>
> I think this is the best long term solution. Things that can be found
> from the system are, those that aren't, come from the newly build
> libgcc_s.
Mike,
It really would be nice if this behavior could be automated such
that the default build (which currently links everything against the FSF gcc
libgcc) is allowed to access all of the symbols in libgcc_s.1 rather
than just the versioned copy. Considering one is using a locally
built version of libgcc from a particular version of FSF gcc, I think
this attempt to force uniformity on that libgcc is rather pointless.
Jack
