On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 16:10 -0700, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote: > The last time this came up, the consensus was that we should not hard fail > the configure script even if the user would then be missing some mpfr bugfix > in the latest/greatest release. That's why we have the minimum/recommended > split.
Doesn't this mean that we can then have two different versions of GCC (as identified by gcc --version), linked with different mpfr libraries, that may exhibit different behaviour? Ben
