On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:11:41AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > Right. However, the wording I saw was much broader than just the > plugin model. It was vague and poorly worded, and you could interpret > it as saying that use of a non-GPL assembler or linker was also not > allowed to build or link the libraries.
That's the version that was dumped, exactly for the reasons you state.
