On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Aldy Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems to me that the only approach here would be to provide caret > diagnostics, because reconstructing the original sources from GENERIC > seems like a loosing proposition.
Hi Aldy, I agree with your analysis. > > But, is this slew of work even worth it? For the long term benefit, yes. > I for one think that the > aforementioned PRs should at least be marked down considerably. 3 of > them are P2s-- and I think they should be some Pn+5, and/or mark them as > an enhancement request. > > Are there any thoughts on this (the PRs, the caret diagnostics, plan of > attack, etc?). I'm kind of busy at the moment, and had put off work on caret diagnostics. I've seen mail suggesting that some folks are working on it... > > Aldy >
