On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 02:20:55PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:52:27PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >> >> >> >> Do you have an application that shows that the current >> >> implementation of chmod() is a bottleneck? >> > >> > Yes, this might be a case of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". >> > >> >> It is broken: > > Do you have an application that shows that it is broken? > >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36755 > > I've read the PR. > >> The implementation in libgfortran is incorrect. It doesn't >> handle signal nor check return from wait to match pid. > > In that chmod() is not defined by the Fortran Standard, > how can you infer that libgfortran's implementation is > incorrect? >
Please read a decent UNIX system book or look how system () is implemented in glibc. -- H.J.
