On 7/8/08, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I was under the impression that these would be cleaned up before the > > -W options were applied to the trunk. > > It's pretty hard to clean up all the warnings for every possible > target. Also these are only warnings--this code is not compiled with > -Werror. > > In this case, I argue that this code is always compiled with a C > compiler, and should never be compiled by a C++ compiler. Therefore, > I believe it is wrong for this code to be compiled with the > -Wc++-compat warning enabled. This should be fixed somewhere in the > configure script and/or Makefile.
Ok. How about these? ../../gcc/gcc/bitmap.c: In function 'bitmap_obstack_alloc_stat': ../../gcc/gcc/bitmap.c:359: warning: request for implicit conversion from 'void *' to 'struct bitmap_head_def *' not permitted in C++ ../../gcc/gcc/bitmap.c: In function 'bitmap_obstack_free': ../../gcc/gcc/bitmap.c:394: warning: request for implicit conversion from 'void *' to 'struct bitmap_element *' not permitted in C++
