On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 22:05 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > How is that irrelevant? If the argument is that libjava takes too > > long to build on modern hardware, and someone else has a different > > view of what is modern hardware where the original argument is > > invalid... what makes your view "correct" and HJ's view "incorrect"? > > Quad cores are available for exactly 1 architecture (x86) at affordable > prices, GCC is supposed to support more than just x86.
I'm curious at how many GCC developpers use non x86/_64 as their main development machine (and how many non x86/_64 core they use). Laurent
