> Kunal Parmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is this correct : > > ret_label = gen_label_rtx (); > > emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_REG (HImode, 7), > > gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (VOIDmode, > > ret_label)); > > emit_call_insn (gen_brc_call_simulate (addr, args_size)); > > emit_label (ret_label);
Ian Lance Taylor: > It looks plausible. It looks like a mis-optimization waiting to happen. Nothing tells the compiler that it can't move an instruction bewteen the call and the label. You are better off generating the label or immediately emitting the assembly for the label when you emit the assembly code for the call.
